Big law firms and lateral moves

Conflicts of interest at law firms: the eight rules of Article 12 of the Code of Ethics

Conflict of interest is one of the most relevant ethical risks for a firm with many clients. The Code of Ethics of the Spanish Legal Profession devotes eight rules to it in its Article 12, and the last extends all the others to the firm as a whole.

Editorial photo: conflict of interest at a law firm
Image generated with AI

The more a firm grows, the more likely it is that two of its clients end up on opposite sides, or that a new client wants to act against a former one. The Code of Ethics of the Spanish Legal Profession, approved by the Plenary of the General Council of the Spanish Legal Profession on 6 March 2019, regulates these situations in section C of its Article 12.

We review its eight rules and what they imply for a firm's organisation.

The general rule

Section C.1 prohibits defending or advising interests opposed to those of other clients whom one is or has been defending or advising, or to the lawyer's own interests. The Code presents loyalty to the client as the fundamental principle in this area.

The eight rules

SectionSituationRule
C.1Opposing interestsProhibited to defend or advise them, including against one's own interests
C.2Conflict between two or more clientsWithdraw from defending or advising all of them, unless all those affected expressly authorise
C.3Intermediation and drafting contractsMay act for all parties, with strict objectivity
C.4Former clientDo not accept engagements against them if there is a risk to the secrecy of their information or the new client could benefit from it. Never in the same proceeding or its incidents, appeals or enforcement
C.5Family by mutual agreementWhoever defended both parties cannot later act for one against the other in the resulting steps, unless they acted for only one with the other's consent
C.6Several clients in the same situationProhibited if a conflict arises between them, there is a risk to secrecy or independence is endangered
C.7Prior consultation by the other side or a colleagueDo not accept the engagement if in that consultation information was obtained that compromises independence, secrecy or loyalty
C.8Collective firmsThe rules apply to the group as a whole and to each member, whatever the associative form

The rule that most affects firms: section C.8

Section C.8 is what turns conflict of interest into a matter of organisation. The previous rules do not apply only to the lawyer handling the matter, but to the whole firm, whatever its form: professional company, lawyers' association or collaboration.

That means a firm cannot resolve a conflict by assigning each client to a different team. If the firm, as a group, has a conflict, each of its members has it.

For a firm organised as a professional company, the rule adds to the corporate obligations we review in the guide to the professional law firm company.

The former client: the most delicate case

Section C.4 does not always prohibit acting against a former client. It requires assessing the risk: if there is the possibility of breaching the secrecy of the information obtained, or of the new client benefiting from it, the engagement cannot be accepted. The Code says that the type of matters and the time elapsed are weighed.

What is absolute is the prohibition on acting against the former client in the same proceeding in which they were defended, or in its incidents, appeals, enforcement or derived proceedings.

The connection with professional secrecy is direct, as we explain in the editorial on professional secrecy and client documents.

The prior consultation

Section C.7 covers a situation that can occur at any firm: the other party, or a colleague, consults the firm before the client hires it. If in that consultation information was obtained that puts independence, secrecy or loyalty at risk, the firm cannot later accept the other party's engagement.

How to organise prevention

  1. A database of clients and opposing parties for all matters, current and past, across the whole firm.
  2. A check before accepting any engagement or consultation, including initial consultations.
  3. A record of prior consultations that do not end in an engagement, because of the risk in section C.7.
  4. Express written authorisations when the exceptions in section C.2 apply.
  5. Coordination with money laundering prevention, because client identification serves both purposes, as we explain in the guide to anti-money laundering at law firms.

More analysis in Big law firms and lateral moves.

Fuentes

  1. Consejo General de la Abogacía Española. Código Deontológico de la Abogacía Española, aprobado por el Pleno el 6 de marzo de 2019 (PDF). Accessed 18 October 2026.

The specific data in this article come from the official sources cited.

Agente Lex Newsroom Redacción

Editorial team of AGENTE LEX. We produce analysis and news for the legal profession from public and official sources, which we link at the end of each article.

View profile and articles →